Universal Inflation – Has It Occured? VC1-E4

Universal Inflation – Has It Occured? According to science the most accepted position
is that it occurred a beginning of the universe and this one coming from a great expansion
called Big Bang. According to the bible and several other archaeological
records, the universe had a beginning and this one came from a higher entity. Today, the Big Bang is being questioned and
its bases being destroyed. Today the universe is analyzed not as an expansion
but as a sponge. In which there are places with large spaces
and places with great concentration of stars. The big problem of the Big Bang is to say
if this inflation occurred. To explain the formation of the universe by
scientists requires two things that can not be proved, one is the inflation of the universe
and the other is dark matter. One trying to adjust to the other, when one
creates two things that can not be proved and one to fit the other. You can imagine what you want! For example, if I say there is a box with
a live and dead cat, and when I open it it is alive and I say that it is alive because
it is not at the stage where it was not dead. And if I open it when it’s dead, I say I opened
it at the stage that was not alive. The cat’s leap is that if I see him dead and
close the box he will not come back to live. To exist a undead cat requires two things
that can not be proved, one that exists only if I detect and the second is that there is
an unreliability that can not be calculated. See that there are two things that can not
be proved and that one adjusts to another, so that none goes wrong. That way everything is possible. So it also happens with the theory of the
universe, which I can not adjust with the theory of inflation, I adjust to the theory
of dark matter. Being that neither one nor the other is proven. To show the reality of the problem let us
begin at the beginning of time in the most accepted ideology of science and this is the
starting point – time 0. You will not see scientists talking about
this because this is where their problem begins. First, the physical laws do not evolve, so
they have to be complete at t=0. The laws that govern the universe do not change,
if they change the universe would completely alter and by randomness the chance to destroy
is infinitely certain. Thus, all laws have to be in the initial system. According to whether something exists and
is not provided for in the laws, the universe would be destroyed. If in the future of time 0, something not
controlled by the laws occurs, the universe would collapse, because it would cause a discontinuity
in the universe. For example, if in a program something happens
outside the control of the programming, the system falls, that is, it stops working. Third, based on the second everything that
occurs in the future is already predicted in time equal to zero. It is a mere consequence of the second, if
not predicted, again the universe collapses because the laws could not control something
outside the laws. Room has to exist the outside, if there is
no the outside can not be said that there is inflation. If there is no outside, we can say that instead
of inflation, we have an internal deflation. That is, instead of expanding the universe
we can imagine the interior being minimized. And now things start to complicate: fifth,
if there are conscious beings, the laws have to predict and support such consciousnesses. That is, if there is a conscious being who
is superior to the laws he lives, the universe collapses. Sixth, in order for laws to exist in such
a way, it is necessary that there be a consciousness that surpasses all the consciences that come
to exist. Now, if laws are needed that support sentient
beings, something superior to these anticipating consciousness is necessary, so that there
will never be an object that surpasses the laws, otherwise the universe would collapse. Seventh, all this has to exist at time 0. That is, we are seeing something that was
usually called a miracle. That is, at the central point of this logic,
which can not be annulled, we have the obligation that at time 0 the universe be at least conscious
above any future consciousness, and not dependent on time and space. This analysis is merely logical, it is not
a theory, it is a logical axiom. Because it is an axiom, scientists do not
seek to analyze this, because this axiom would break their personal concepts. See, we have only a logical analysis of the
initial time, between the initial time and the beginning. In which scientists try to ignore, to manage
their concepts and creating dual self-controlling laws that can not be proven to justify their

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *